As I have reported, over the past 6 – 12 months, I have expanded my research and consulting practice to include Information Technology Automation / Workload Management and more importantly Information Technology Operations Analytics (ITOA).
During this time, I have conducted multiple market research projects, talked to many of the vendors in the industry, interviewed CIOs from the Global 2000 and published multiple articles:
- IT Automation Software in 2014 Should Provide Unified Control of All Enterprise Systems From A Single Centralized Platform
- Survey of Global 1000 CIOs on ITOA and IT Automation Produces Surprising Results
- Does Your CEO Understand ITOA and IT Automation?
- The Intelligent Data Center and ITOA
- Information Technology Operations Analytics (ITOA) Continuing to Emerge
During this time, I have also been engaged in several projects with Global 2000 clients that have asked me to assist with defining “Next Generation IT Automation”, choosing the appropriate technology, implementation and “On Boarding / Cultural Issues”. The vendors that my initial set of clients chose to evaluate, test and integrate included Evolen, BMC Software, Mulesoft, ServiceNow, Stonebranch, Box, Alfresco, OpenText and Elastic. There is obviously some technology overlap with these vendors and therefore not all of them will be chosen by the same client.
Please note that the one technology that i was not able to get any of my clients to utilize on the first go around was machine learning / predictive analytics. A passion of mine for many years, I am confident that the next round will include some very impressive use of machine learning to identify, analyze and extract / move data.
The primary goals of these clients was to move to the next level with Big Data Analytics of their IT operations, extract actionable items and then automate those items. In some cases, these clients wanted to really “push the envelope” of ITOA. In other cases, they simple wanted to automated published Records Management policies for moving data into the appropriate Records Management System without the need for “human intervention”. In yet another case, they wanted to automate “Legacy Data Cleanup” and again automatically (or as one CEO kept say, “magically”) move data into the right “buckets”.
This past week, I went back to all of the clients that had projects underway and got an update. Some of the results were interesting and exciting. Following is a summary of some of my findings:
- Some of the legacy technology was not as easy to integrate as the would have liked.
- Some of the new “hot shot” SaaS based / cloud based technology vendors had trouble even spelling Governance, Risk and Compliance (GRC) let alone assist with design, integration and implementation.
- Some of the Analytics Platforms were very difficult to get data in to and/or customize for specific purposes.
- Some of the Analytic Platforms didn’t have a clue in regards to how to integrate with the IT Automation Agent vendors to complete the loop of automation.
- Overall, the level of professional services was very vendor centric with little to no interest and or knowledge or how to play nicely with other required vendors.
In the coming weeks, some of these projects will have progressed to the point that they wll begin to draw up the paper work for the fall purchasing season and therefore I will publish another update. Hopefully, I will be able to identify which vendors were chosen, how they were integrated and how they performed.
- How to Engage Enterprise Buyers in Meaningful Conversations in 2016 February 28, 2016
- nVIDIA Driving Deep Learning to the Forefront – Literally February 22, 2016
- New Technologies Disrupting the Legal Business in the UK February 17, 2016
- Shares of Tableau plunge 36% after company posts $41M loss in Q4 February 5, 2016
- LexisNexis Unveils Lexis® DiscoveryIQ eDiscovery Platform Enhanced by Brainspace February 2, 2016